CONFLUENCE AND RUPTURE OF THE SOCIETY IN THE NEW EUROPEAN SPACE:

The appartenence of humans to the religious, cultural organisation, has also in the new Europe, of the changing and the recondtruction, painfully and gratefully developed, with the roots of the ideologic lineages , which will have under the influences of traditions conflicts with the fluctuant progression of the structures again and again. The passivity and the activity of the multicultural currents does not need only tolerance and-culture recdption, but also too it needs the ability to be homogen and transposable and under the norms of the real news democracy and for human beings a collocation oh the human rights a collocation of respect.
The breacups of the political systems in the Eastern block countries with bloody and ideological revolutions, the idea of exoneration and liberation from the communistic tyranny, has been interpreted in west Europe variedly, it hat also been critised, because in the west, the rebels who didn’t observe the low, where very easily punished.
The manipulation oh might , and the instruction of Multimedia programs as followed variedly some conceps of interpretation about the roles of revolution with possible positive amn negative pourpose. They braught like it happens in wars, masses of refugees at the doors of the rich countries, which had to get an asylum, like it should be in the human rights to accept these people, but it is limitated in a system of numbers, of the strict criterias of proof, which was estabilished. The rebels of the Eastern Block countries were sceptical, they were even regared sneeringly from some authorities of some countries,especially those, who didn’t have any proof for their political pursuit. And in the tragic reality things were like that these dissidents,who were often tortured, abused and put in prison, didn’t have proofs at all, about the political persecution, because of the papers , no communistic official, would write on the redundancy letter, of the prison,, that the rebel was a traitor or a fighter against the regim, but they wrote more or less that the rebel was a criminal, a thief or a maniac .Even now a days
Some dissidents are regarded as criminals and as team –incapable comiters in the countries of new Europe, because they had the courage , to defy a political game. This hard fate persue them their whole life, without the possibility of rebellion. Inspirited by the story of fate of the migration and the criminals of culture, the Arabian Bassam Tibis conceived a new political philosophy; about the transmutation of the new system of European values and about the fate of people without a country, who aren’t who have difficultes integrate in new Europe because of their culture, religion or because of their political concepts .An Europe whitout any identity is a content with mixed cultures, but which occurs fragmentarily, unassimilating because of the conflicts of socialisation and because of the civilisation of multicultural influences, which are pessimistically manifested, in their desparading atemps to find a context, with constructive dialogues. He describes in his book generally the desastruous policy opposite to the migrants, and the miserable existence difficulty of the refugees, more over he describes the categorisation of the migrants, the world category of other people, who have another religion, another culture and another customs. The appearance of the Ghettos at the limits of the States are aware constructed reservations , , like the old principle of integrated Indians from amerika , who were forced to live in reservations , or to live after the principle of Theodor Herzl, who thought something similar about the Jews in Germany.
Unconsciously, these individuals and separated from the rest of society, separated from the normal individuals; they are ordered at the other social, and cultural places of society, integrated and isolated from people , who speake the some language.
The moral and social substrate hardly are not notice, because there are very good, nets prepared, to create a perfect isolation.
The system degrades the pronuncion, the ideas, the personality will be cleaved, or U be totally destroyed , the memory “be destroyed, the self –confidance will be degradeted an insecure.
That makes the new candidates of the new democraty good slaves of the society , they accept the workstations for the illerates , which are even accepted by the illerates , which are even accepted by the illerates themselves, who slowly let them assimilate, now formed, transformed in the new phases of the selvs destruction.
When they are valurable people tell them that they critizise works from those, who are intellectually, gifted , as kitschy and onerous , untalented and valueless.
The migrants want to assure their places, in a society whitout discrimination, to let assimilate himself , as new commoner with the some rights , like other commoner.
The identity of the commoners is often interpreted by their demeaneor , by their traditional culture and religious appartenence. The philosophy in our century doesn’t only engages in programs for orientation of the new Europeans, it also asks questions about the possibilities and of new, foreign cultures of other religions and acts impartically, every once in a while aggressive acts.
Many philosophies deal with these questions about a integration of foreigners for almost 70 years,-
They deal with the migration and with the situation of desidents, who come from countries , from the eastern Block or who come from countries , where injust wars take place.(Wars between the civilians /civil war).
In the 70-ies there was a core of scientist, philosophies, culture-specialists, who where all interested in new ideas for values and the difficulty foreigners, the emigrants from the Eastern Block. Regulary meetings and podium- discussion were estabilished; they persuaded politicians , they taked about solutions because of the conflicts and problems of the multicultural societies.
In September 15, 1977, at a very important appointment for a podium –discussion about the problems of East and West, there met important personalities from France, Russia, Pollen, s Eugene Ionesco, Wladimir Bukowsky, the Russian philosoph Alexandri Pjatigorsky, the French Autors Andre Glucksmann, and jean francois Revel, as Ilias Janakakis, the emigrated Greek in Czechoslovakia.
He lives in France since 1968, and is still today professor at the university in Lille.
A reported participant was also, Michael Focault, but he wasn’t content with the course of the discussion and that’s the reason why he didn’t want to publish his contribution.
He participated in discussion and was a organisator and organisator and editor of periodics, dove publishes, Ullstein, Gallimard from Paris, and many people od dissidents .
The identity of the two categories from people, from the West and from the East was a crucial point of trhis debate, because it dealt with the uniformisation, disinformation and with lies;
The transformation in the middle of the joint practice provokes. Human are also culturally manipulable , they can either accept or not with a correct policy and culture representative or day can cleave.
On this note, ”Pjatigorsky”, talked about the problem of abstraction , with terms, and definitions like “West” or “westward human”; over dimensionality or rumors about the story, which is cleaved in a community of humans with racist, xenophobic, nationalistic concept and belief , masked from the policy and influenced by the Ministry of interior, and strategist, who arrange psychological wars, to conceive unavare impulses.
“We say, the West most”, “The west has to understanding “:-I assure you, the west hasn’t to do nothing.” In front of the eyes of the whole world, it is declared in the letter. The world hasn’t got awarness. There isn’t collective awarness. Wenn review my life as philosoph, from my childhood on the flight of the West, so I can’t regard myself neithers as talentated, nor as intelligent. They have betrayed us, because, we were blockheads. As well, like in 1792, and 1793, they betrayed the blockheads, how they will be betrayed further on ”(…..)..”I understand it, when courageous people, who have been tortured , talk to us about the problem of the vote. I understand it very well. But this Problem, should be imposed on another human,, it isn’t even allowed to address this problem to another human, because then we are captives of the eternal dichotomy of